How much is asus zenfone max pro m1. Smartphones ASUS ZenFone Max. ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1 Full Specifications

Review of frameless smartphone ZenFone Max Plus M1 from Asus. The appearance of the device, screen, camera characteristics, performance, autonomy, price, pros and cons, video review.

Recently, smartphones with 18:9 displays are gaining more and more popularity. They are produced in different price categories by eminent manufacturers and little-known companies. The reason for this demand is that elongation allows you to fit a screen with a larger diagonal into a compact case - because of this, gadgets look compact and attractive. In this article we will talk about the inexpensive and pretty model Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1. This is an interesting device with a good filling, decent design and a number of features.

ZenFone Max Plus M1 Design Features and Package Contents

• Two eyes of chamber modules.
• Flash.
• Fingerprint scanner.

All edges and corners are rounded, there are no sharp cuts. At first glance, the device seemed a little boring to us, without a twist, if you do not take into account the non-standard display. It is similar, both to previous models from this manufacturer, and to a number of gadgets from competing companies. The entire area of ​​the front panel is covered with 2.5D glass, it has a fairly high-quality oleophobic coating, fingerprints are not particularly noticeable, and scratches did not appear in a couple of days of active testing.

From the point of view of convenience, we liked using the Asus Zenfon Max Plus M1 smartphone - it is securely located in the palm of your hand and does not slip, despite the absence of sharp corners and edges.

On the front panel of the device are:

• Sufficiently loud, good quality speaker.
• Light and proximity sensors.
• Selfie camera lens.
• Battery charge indicator.

On the bottom of the smartphone Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 are:

• Speaker and microphone grilles.
• micro USB input.

The right side is equipped with metal, reliable, finger-friendly, easy-to-press volume buttons and a power key. On the left side there is a tray that opens with a paper clip that comes with the kit. Nano SIM cards are installed in it, and separately, in the third cell, you can put a microSD memory card. A very good solution, since the user does not have to sacrifice a second SIM card or flash drive, as is the case with a combo slot.

All the colors that the manufacturer offers are quite nice and pleasing to the eye. On sale, at the moment there are Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 in the following colors:

1. Sunny gold.
2. Black wave.
3. Azure silver.

The device looks neat and stylish, and as for the dimensions, they are:

• Length - 152.6 mm.
• Width - 73 mm.
• Thickness - 8.8 mm.

The device comes to the buyer in a nice, neat white-blue box with a large image of the device on both sides, the model name, some brief information about the device and the manufacturer's logo on the top. The package contains:

1. Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 smartphone itself.
2. OTG cable.
3. Charger.
4. Micro USB cable.
5. A paperclip used to remove the SIM and memory card tray.
6. Required user documentation, including warranty card and quick start guide.

The device is assembled well, and looking at it, you understand that you have a high-quality, reliable device that will surely serve faithfully for a long time without any problems.

Display Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1

As for the other characteristics of the Zenfon Max Plus M1 display, they are as follows:

• Screen resolution - 2160x1080 pixels (FullHD +).
• Size - 64x128 mm.
• The pixel density is 427 ppi.
• The presence of protective glass 2.5D.
• Matrix - IPS without an air gap.
• Blue light filtering.
• Adaptive brightness control.
• Multitouch.

I was pleased with the anti-reflective coating, which does an excellent job of its functions and allows you to read text files normally even on a bright, sunny afternoon outside. In general, the screen of the Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 smartphone is perfectly tuned, we liked the lack of distortion, gamma, color temperature, and brightness margin.

Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 performance specs

With memory, everything is also quite mediocre, but there is enough reserve for everyday tasks. More precisely:

1. ROM-32GB eMCP.
2. RAM- 3 GB, LPDDR3.

Zenfon Max Plus M1 runs on the Android 7 operating system with the proprietary ZenUI 4.0 shell. We liked this version of the user interface for its lightness, accessibility and good functionality. But whether there will be an update to Android 8 in the near future and whether it will be at all, unfortunately, is still unknown. The proprietary shell has a number of features and its own "chips", such as the ZenUI defender, ZenMotion, SelfieMaster, Game Genie, AudioWizard.

There is a fairly popular face recognition function today. It works, to tell the truth, not without errors, but let's hope that soon the company's developers will pay attention to this problem. In general, the device certainly does not “fly” - it did not impress us with its speed. You can feel the budget.

Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 - review of cameras and sound

Implemented in the Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 smartphone, PixelMaster technology provides the user with the ability to shoot in eight different modes:

• auto;
• portrait improvement;
• super resolution up to 64 MP;
• panorama;
• Slow motion;
• panorama;
• GIF animation.

As for the additional second module of the main camera, it is 8-megapixel with an equivalent focal length of 16.7 mm. Wide-angle lens - 120 degree field of view. Therefore, the device makes excellent panoramic and group shots, because more objects and space fit into the frame. According to the manufacturer, the coverage of the Asus ZenFone Max Plus M1 cameras is twice that of ordinary smartphones. Also, the aspect ratio in the frame - 18:9 - contributes to the enhancement of the sense of space.

The front camera also performed quite well. Selfies come out detailed and realistic. As for the main characteristics, this module has the following:

• Resolution - 8 MP.
• Aperture - f / 2.0.
• Viewing angle - 85 degrees.
• Focal length - 24.7 mm.

• auto mode with HDR function;
• panoramic selfies;
• GIF animation.

A loud speaker and a built-in amplifier with controlled power consumption are responsible for the sound. The device has two microphones, they have good noise reduction. Also, the device has an FM radio, a trifle, but nice. The sound in the included headphones is unremarkable, it's not bad, but you can't call it an audio connoisseur's dream either.

Autonomy, sensors, wireless interfaces ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1

1. Temperature excesses.
2. short circuits.
3. Voltage overloads at the input and output.
4. Reset.
5. High and low voltage supply.
6. Overcurrent.

A capacious 4130 mAh battery is responsible for the autonomy of the gadget. While charging the device using the original charger, the fast charging function automatically turns on. This is not Quick Charge, but Fast Charge - but not bad either. In this case, Zenfon Max Plus M1 will charge from zero to 100% in just three and a quarter hours. Fifteen minutes of connection to the outlet is enough to then talk for about three hours. As for the main indicators declared by the manufacturer, then:

1. In standby mode (4G), the device will last up to 26 days.
2. Talk time - 26 hours in 3G networks.
3. Video can play - 13 hours.
4. Web surfing on a Wi-Fi network - up to 21 hours.

Interestingly, when testing the battery, we found that it honestly delivers the declared power. Such a short battery life is most likely due to a software bug or some other reasons.

Wireless technologies and networks in ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1 are presented:

• Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz + Wi-Fi direct.
• Bluetooth 4.0.
• FDD-LTE, TD-LTE, WCDMA, GSM.

GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS is responsible for navigation in the smartphone.

Of the sensors in the ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1, there are:

• electronic compass;
• gyroscope;
• proximity sensor
• light sensor;
• acceleration sensor.

Pros and cons of Asus Zenfon Max Plus M1, price

1. Excellent, well calibrated screen.
2. High-quality protective glass with a good oleophobic coating and anti-reflective properties.
3. Not bad, as for a state employee, cameras and many shooting modes.
4. Normal "iron", well coping with its tasks.
5. Affordable price

1. A bit boring design.
2. Lack of NFC.
3. Easy-to-weld back metal cover.
4. Relatively poor battery life with such a battery capacity.
5. When the wide-angle lens is activated, the photo quality deteriorates significantly.

ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1 Full Specifications

Drawing conclusions, having got to know the device better, I would like to say that both the appearance and the characteristics of the ZenFone Max Plus M1 are pretty good, especially for a gadget in this price category. Therefore, for those who want to buy a new, so popular today, slightly elongated phone with an aspect ratio of 18:9, with a high-quality screen, modern filling, good cameras and not overpay, this model will be an excellent choice.

Video review of ASUS ZenFone Max Plus M1 is presented below:

By the end of 2017, even in low-cost smartphones, such features as an elongated screen with a minimal frame around and two rear cameras began to appear more and more often. These models are aimed at those buyers who are not ready to overpay for flagships, but at the same time want to get a smartphone with newfangled features. An example of such a device is Asus Zenfone Max Plus (M1). Zenfone Max Plus is not explicitly included in any of the Asus Zenfone smartphone lines of its time (it came out later than the Zenfone 4 generation and ahead of the Zenfone 5). Typically, models with the “Max” index from Asus are characterized by the presence of a capacious battery.

In Russia, the Asus Zenfone Max Plus smartphone at the end of November, and at the presentation it was noted that our country was the first to demonstrate it. And already in mid-December, the model appeared on the shelves at a price of 17 thousand rubles (for the version with a memory capacity of 4/64 GB). To date, the price of this modification has decreased and amounts to 16 thousand rubles. There is also a cheaper version with 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of flash memory, which we had for testing. It can be bought for 14 thousand.

The main trump cards of the device are a relatively large display with a minimum frame and an aspect ratio of 18:9 (instead of the standard 16:9) and a resolution of 2160 × 1080, rather compact body dimensions, a capacious battery (4130 mAh), and the presence of two rear cameras, one of which is wide-angle.

About how successful and balanced the smartphone turned out to be, you will learn from our review.

Main characteristics

For clarity, let's compare the characteristics of the novelty with one of the competitors - presented almost simultaneously and also entered the Russian market in mid-December, with a very close price (17 thousand for the 4/64 GB version) and largely similar parameters.

As you can see, the models have similar features: the hardware platform is represented by an inexpensive eight-core SoC, the software component is based on Android 7.0 with the smartphone manufacturer's proprietary shell. Screens with an aspect ratio of 18:9 and a resolution of 2160 × 1080 are slightly different diagonally (the Honor smartphone is generally slightly larger), while the small bezel allows you to maintain acceptable body dimensions.

Let's pay attention to the presence in both cases of a fingerprint scanner and support for two SIM cards (these are pluses), but Micro-USB connectors are used, and not the more convenient and modern USB Type-C (this is a minus). In addition, the Asus smartphone has a larger battery capacity and resolution of the second rear camera, and everything else is slightly better in the Huawei model (more powerful SoC, more RAM and internal memory at a comparable price, all-metal body, etc.).

The screen glass has a slight rounding on the edges, which is commonly called 2.5D. And although you will no longer surprise users with this, even in the budget segment, this technique still seems to be successful. As for the aspect ratio (18:9), it is convenient for working with any lists (letters, notes, purchases, etc.). Zenfone Max Plus is historically the first Asus smartphone on the Russian market with this aspect ratio.

At the same time, the overall dimensions of the device are average. It does not seem very large, it fits comfortably in the hand. Calling it a “shovel” does not turn the tongue, especially given the greater elongation of the case than that of smartphones with a 16:9 screen.

The case is made partly from metal (the main part of the back surface, all buttons), partly from plastic (bottom and top parts). Due to the close color of these parts, the case looks solid, and only upon closer examination it is clear that the materials are still different.

The matte surface is quite practical and is not prone to minor scratches, scuffs and other damage (of course, if you do not try to damage the smartphone on purpose). But as a minus, it is worth noting the high soiling: fingerprints are collected on the case quickly, they are rubbed off poorly and are striking.

On the right side face are two oblong buttons. The one that is longer is the volume control. The one that is shorter and located below is responsible for turning on / off the smartphone.

On the bottom edge is a Micro-USB connector surrounded by holes, behind one row of which a speaker is hidden.

Above - only a 3.5 mm jack for a headset and an additional microphone hole.

On the left side there is a slot for installing SIM-cards and memory cards. All three cards (2 × Nano-SIM + microSD) can be used simultaneously, which is a plus.

The fingerprint scanner is located on the back surface, where it is convenient to put your index finger on it.

And at the top on the back surface we see two camera eyes and a flash. Note that the block with cameras is only slightly raised above the level of the back cover, and this is not evident.

Continuing the comparison of Asus Zenfone Max Plus and Honor X7, we can note that their design is also similar. There are rounded edges, a wide screen with a narrow frame around, and identically located cameras and a fingerprint scanner ... However, many mid-budget and budget smartphones look like twin brothers, so it's not surprising. Ultimately, in this price category, the emphasis is not primarily on a unique appearance, but on the optimal combination of functionality and price.

Screen

The smartphone has an elongated screen with an aspect ratio of 18:9 and a resolution of 2160 × 1080. You can learn about how successful the display turned out from testing by Alexei Kudryavtsev, editor of the "Monitors" and "Projectors and TV" sections.

The front surface of the screen is made in the form of a glass plate with a mirror-smooth surface, resistant to scratches. Judging by the reflection of objects, the anti-glare properties of the screen are no worse than those of the screen of the Google Nexus 7 (2013) (hereinafter simply Nexus 7). For clarity, here is a photo in which a white surface is reflected in the off screens (on the left is Nexus 7, on the right is Asus Zenfone Max Plus, then they can be distinguished by size):

The screen of Asus Zenfone Max Plus is slightly lighter (brightness in photos is 117 versus 114 for Nexus 7). The doubling of reflected objects in the Asus Zenfone Max Plus screen is very weak, which indicates that there is no air gap between the screen layers (more specifically, between the outer glass and the LCD matrix surface) (OGS type screen - One Glass Solution). Due to the smaller number of borders (glass/air type) with very different refractive indices, such screens look better in conditions of intense external illumination, but their repair in case of cracked external glass is much more expensive, since the entire screen has to be changed. There is a special oleophobic (grease-repellent) coating on the outer surface of the screen (even better than the Nexus 7 in terms of efficiency), so fingerprints are removed much easier and appear at a slower rate than in the case of ordinary glass.

With manual brightness control and with a white field displayed in full screen, the maximum brightness value was about 430 cd / m², the minimum was 8.5 cd / m². The maximum brightness is quite high, and given the good anti-glare properties, the readability of the screen even on a sunny day outdoors should be at an acceptable level. In complete darkness, the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable value. In the presence of automatic brightness control by light sensor (it is located to the left of the front speaker slot). In automatic mode, when the ambient light conditions change, the screen brightness both increases and decreases. This function depends on the position of the brightness slider. If it is at 100%, then in total darkness the auto-brightness function reduces the brightness to 20 cd / m² (normal), in an artificially lit office (about 550 lux) sets it to 310 cd / m² (suitable), in a very bright environment (corresponds to outdoors on a clear day, but without direct sunlight - 20,000 lux or a little more) the brightness rises to 430 cd / m² (to the maximum - that's right). If the adjustment is about 50%, then the values ​​are: 16, 230 and 430 cd/m² (also suitable values). If the regulator is at 0% - 8.5, 90 and 380 cd / m² (the values ​​\u200b\u200bare slightly underestimated, which is logical). It turns out that the auto-brightness function works adequately and allows the owner to customize their work to individual requirements. At any brightness level, there is no significant backlight modulation, so there is no screen flicker.

This smartphone uses an IPS type matrix. Micrographs show a typical IPS subpixel structure:

For comparison, you can see the gallery of microphotographs of screens used in mobile technology.

The screen has good viewing angles without significant color shift even at large deviations of the gaze from the perpendicular to the screen and without inverting shades. For comparison, here are photographs in which the same images are displayed on the screens of Asus Zenfone Max Plus and Nexus 7, while the brightness of the screens was initially set to about 200 cd / m², and the color balance on the camera was forcibly switched to 6500 K.

White field perpendicular to the screens:

Note the good uniformity of brightness and color tone of the white field.

And a test picture:

Colors on the Asus Zenfone Max Plus screen have a natural saturation, the color balance of the Nexus 7 and the tested screen differs markedly. Now at an angle of about 45 degrees to the plane and to the side of the screen:

It can be seen that the colors have not changed much on both screens, but on the Asus Zenfone Max Plus, the contrast has decreased to a greater extent due to more black highlighting. And the white box:

The brightness at an angle of the screens has decreased (at least 5 times, based on the difference in shutter speed), but the Asus Zenfone Max Plus screen at this angle is still a little darker. The black field, when deviated diagonally, is highlighted strongly and acquires a brown tint. The photos below demonstrate this (the brightness of the white areas in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the screens is the same!):

And from another angle:

When viewed perpendicularly, the uniformity of the black field is excellent:

Contrast (approximately in the center of the screen) is high - about 970:1. The response time for the black-white-black transition is 21 ms (12 ms on + 9 ms off). The transition between grayscale 25% and 75% (according to the numerical value of the color) and back in total takes 33 ms. The gamma curve constructed from 32 points with an equal interval according to the numerical value of the shade of gray did not reveal a blockage either in the highlights or in the shadows. The exponent of the approximating power function is 2.28, which is slightly higher than the standard value of 2.2. In this case, the real gamma curve slightly deviates from the power dependence:

This device has some kind of dynamic adjustment of the brightness of the backlight in accordance with the nature of the displayed image. As a result, the resulting dependence of brightness on hue (gamma curve) may not correspond to the gamma curve of a static image, since the measurements were carried out with sequential grayscale output almost on the entire screen. For this reason, we carried out a number of tests - determining contrast and response time, comparing black flare at angles - we carried out (however, as always) when displaying special patterns with a constant average brightness, and not monochromatic fields in full screen. It should be noted that in this case, the brightness correction is weakly expressed and has a not entirely obvious dependence on the image, but it would be better not to have it at all.

Color gamut close to sRGB:

The spectra show that the matrix filters moderately mix the components to each other:

As a result, the colors have a natural saturation and hue. By default, the balance of shades on the gray scale is acceptable, since the color temperature, although significantly higher than the standard 6500 K, but the deviation from the blackbody spectrum (ΔE) is below 10, which is considered an acceptable indicator for a consumer device. At the same time, both parameters change slightly from shade to shade - this has a positive effect on the visual assessment of color balance. (The darkest areas of the gray scale can be ignored, since the color balance does not matter much there, and the measurement error of color characteristics at low brightness is large.)

Curves in the charts above Without corr. correspond to the results without any color balance correction, and the curves Corr— data obtained after moving the Blue Filter Mode setting slider to the middle position.

It can be seen that the change in balance corresponds to the expected result, since the color temperature has approached the standard value, and ΔE has decreased. Of course, there is no benefit to vision from this fashionable function, but it will do as a means of correcting color balance.

To summarize: the screen has a not very high maximum brightness, but it has good anti-glare properties, so the device can be used outdoors without any problems even on a sunny summer day. In complete darkness, the brightness can be lowered to a comfortable level. It is permissible to use the mode with automatic brightness adjustment, which works adequately. Also, the advantages of the screen include the presence of an effective oleophobic coating, the absence of an air gap in the layers of the screen and flicker, high contrast, excellent black field uniformity, color gamut close to sRGB and good (after correction) color balance. We attribute the low stability of black to the deviation of the gaze from the perpendicular to the plane of the screen as a significant drawback. However, in general, the screen quality can be considered high.

Operating system

The smartphone runs on the Android 7.0 operating system with the ability to update "over the air". On top of the OS, a proprietary ZenUI 4.0 shell is installed, already familiar to us from a number of previous Asus smartphones (for example,). It offers a number of branded applications that can come in very handy - for example, a set of themes, an advanced file manager, etc.

Camera

As mentioned above, the smartphone is equipped with three cameras: one front, with a resolution of 8 megapixels, and two rear cameras - 16 and 8 megapixels. The front camera provides a good (though not perfect) image quality for selfies - apparently, the same module is installed here as in Asus Zenfone 4. In addition, when shooting with the front camera, you can apply different filters and portrait enhancement modes. You can take panoramic selfies, which will clearly show what is behind you. True, this panorama is being made for a very long time.

The rear cameras are interesting because they allow you to choose between a wide-angle image of 8 megapixels and a high resolution of 16 megapixels. Detailed testing of both cameras was carried out by Anton Solovyov.

The camera does a good job of detailing the field of the frame and according to the plans, not counting the edges of the frame, where blur zones often appear. The program copes with noise relatively well, although in some places you can find unprocessed colored spots. In general, the program behaves very decently and is not zealous with processing. Perhaps the main camera will do a good job with documentary shooting.

The wide-angle module as a whole works just as well, but due to the low resolution and large angle, the detail is noticeably lower. In this case, a large grain is formed from the operation of the noise reduction, fine details merge, and in general the processing looks rougher. However, the wide-angle lens works out the edges of the frame better. For undemanding documentary shooting, this camera is also suitable.

The camera does a good job of capturing video. Oddly enough, even the result of night shooting is not so bad.

Performance and communications

The hardware platform of the smartphone is built on a single-chip system MediaTek MT6750T, made using 28-nanometer technology. This SoC includes eight 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 cores, four of which operate at a frequency of 1 GHz, and four more at 1.5 GHz. The dual-core GPU Mali-T860 with a frequency of 650 MHz is responsible for graphics processing. The amount of RAM is 3 or 4 GB.

We regularly see this budget SoC in inexpensive smartphones - for example, we recently saw it in the Umidigi Crystal smartphone, which, however, has more RAM (4 GB). Let's see how the new Asus performs in comparison with its competitors!

Let's start with browser tests. On all smartphones, testing was carried out in the Chrome browser.

The result, unfortunately, is absolutely expected: the MT6750T is very inferior even to mid-range single-chip systems. One could say that budget smartphones are always inferior to more expensive models, there is nothing strange in this, however, Asus Zenfone Max Plus is far from a budget device, and we picked up rivals with a similar price. It remains only to rejoice that the Asus smartphone performed on a par with the Umidigi Crystal. In general, the use of the budget and obsolete SoC MediaTek MT6750T is one of the weakest points of Asus Zenfone Max Plus.

Now let's look at the results in the comprehensive tests of AnTuTu 6 and GeekBench 4.

Here, too, no surprises, in general, the picture is similar.

But the graphics component of the MT6750T corresponds to competing solutions, in 3D tests the results of all smartphones in the table are approximately on the same level. Yes, Asus Zenfone Max Plus loses a little, but in real use it will hardly be felt.

Summing up the results of performance testing, it can be noted that Asus Zenfone Max Plus not only does not show records, but is noticeably inferior to direct competitors. However, it allows you to comfortably play most games (with the exception of brand new ones) and work in everyday scenarios without any slowdowns.

The communication capabilities of Asus Zenfone Max Plus are typical, rather, for budget solutions: Bluetooth is only version 4.0, Wi-Fi is only in the 2.4 GHz band, there is no NFC module.

The navigation module works with GPS (with A-GPS) and domestic Glonass. Chinese Beidou is not supported. The first satellites during a cold start are detected within tens of seconds. There is a built-in magnetic field sensor for the operation of the compass.

Of the two SIM cards, only one can work in 4G, the other will be limited to 2G even in standby mode. In general, in terms of communication capabilities, Zenfone Max Plus is much inferior even to Asus Zenfone 4 of the previous generation, but this is understandable: we are not testing a flagship, but a much more affordable solution.

thermal images

Below is a thermal image rear surface obtained after 10 minutes of running a battery test in the GFXBenchmark program:

Heating is localized in the upper part of the device, which apparently corresponds to the location of the SoC chip. According to the heat chamber, the maximum heating was 40 degrees (at an ambient temperature of 24 degrees), which is relatively little.

Video playback

To test the "omnivorous" when playing video (including support for various codecs, containers and special features, such as subtitles), we used the most common formats, which make up the bulk of the content available on the Web. Note that for mobile devices it is important to have support for hardware video decoding at the chip level, since it is most often impossible to process modern versions using processor cores alone. Also, do not expect everything from a mobile device to decode everything, since the leadership in flexibility belongs to the PC, and no one is going to challenge it. All results are summarized in a table.

Further testing of video playback performed Alexey Kudryavtsev.

We did not find an MHL interface, as well as Mobility DisplayPort, in this smartphone, so we had to limit ourselves to testing the output of video files on the screen of the device itself. To do this, we used a set of test files with an arrow and a rectangle moving one division per frame (see “Methodology for testing video signal playback and display devices. Version 1 (for mobile devices)”). Screenshots with a shutter speed of 1 s helped determine the nature of the output frames of video files with different parameters: the resolution varied (1280 by 720 (720p), 1920 by 1080 (1080p) and 3840 by 2160 (4K) pixels) and frame rate (24, 25, 30, 50 and 60 fps). In tests, we used a regular video player. The test results are summarized in the table:

Note: If both columns Uniformity and Passes green ratings are set, this means that, most likely, when watching movies, artifacts caused by uneven interleaving and dropping frames will either not be visible at all, or their number and visibility will not affect viewing comfort. Red marks indicate possible problems with the playback of the respective files.

According to the frame output criterion, the quality of video files playback on the screen of the smartphone itself is good, since frames (or groups of frames) can (but are not required) to be displayed with more or less uniform alternation of intervals and without frame drops. When playing video files with a resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels (1080p) on a smartphone screen, the image of the video file itself is displayed exactly at the height of the screen (in landscape orientation), one to one in pixels, that is, in its original resolution. The range of brightness displayed on the screen corresponds to the actual range, so all gradations are displayed in the shadows and in the highlights.

Battery life

The non-removable battery installed in Asus Zenfone Max Plus has a capacity of 4130 mAh. This is a very decent capacity, and besides, the smartphone does not have components that consume energy "as if not in itself." Yes, the old 28nm SoC is not very economical, but it is also not very productive, the core frequencies are low. The screen here has approximately the same area as a typical 5.5-inch smartphone, and is not extremely bright. As a result, in standard test scenarios, the device proved to be worthy - this is clearly seen from the comparative table. In real usage scenarios, under a normal average mode of operation, the hero of the review will easily live one day of active use and two days of medium active use.

Testing was traditionally carried out at the usual level of power consumption without using power saving functions, although these are naturally available in the device. In the case of Asus smartphones, power saving modes are managed in the PowerMaster application. In addition to standard options, such as disabling network connections, auto-brightness, etc., there are also additional features, such as increasing battery life (though with a slight reduction in battery life).

12:00 p.m.

Continuous reading in the FBReader program (with a standard, light theme) at the minimum comfortable brightness level (the brightness was set to 100 cd / m²) lasted about 17 hours until the battery was completely discharged, and when continuously watching YouTube videos in high quality (720p) with the same brightness level through the home Wi-Fi network, the device operates for about 10 hours. In the 3D gaming mode, the smartphone lasted almost 6 hours - this is a very good indicator.

From the supplied network adapter, the smartphone is fully charged in about two and a half hours. Wireless charging is not supported.

Outcome

The Asus Zenfone Max Plus smartphone is distinguished by a fashionable elongated screen format and a reduced frame around it (and, consequently, a large percentage of usable front surface area), as well as the presence of two rear cameras, one of which is wide-angle. Of course, with a smartphone price of around 15 thousand rubles, it is strange to demand an impeccable picture from cameras, high performance from SoC, and special originality from case design. In general, the compromises that the manufacturer had to make can be approved. SoC MediaTek is frankly budget here, but, by and large, high performance is needed only for games, and even then not for everyone, and just the graphics component of the platform is not so bad. Cameras do not amaze with quality, but still allow you to get good pictures in a wide range of focal lengths. Everything is sad with communication capabilities: there is no NFC, there is no support for the 5 GHz Wi-Fi band, two SIM cards cannot work simultaneously in 4G. However, the fashionable screen is of good quality, and a capacious battery with a weak SoC provides a fairly long battery life. Asus offers a fairly wide range of smartphones, each of its models has its own attractive sides, and in this sense, the Zenfone Max Plus model can be considered successful.

The smartphone is provided for testing by the manufacturer